### SNOPES.COM LOSES ALL CREDIBILITY

*In 59 voting districts in the Philadelphia region, Obama received 100% of the votes with not even a single vote recorded for Romney. (A mathematical and statistical impossibility).*

It is true that 59 voting divisions in Philadelphia recorded no votes for Mitt Romney, but given the voter composition of the Philadelphia area (and some Philadelphia wards in particular) and the number of voters in each division, that outcome was hardly a "mathematical and statistical impossibility."

Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/2012fraud.asp#yOovTAY2qtXRx7AY.99

*In 59 voting districts in the Philadelphia region, Obama received 100% of the votes with not even a single vote recorded for Romney. (A mathematical and statistical impossibility).*

It is true that 59 voting divisions in Philadelphia recorded no votes for Mitt Romney, but given the voter composition of the Philadelphia area (and some Philadelphia wards in particular) and the number of voters in each division, that outcome was hardly a "mathematical and statistical impossibility."

Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/2012fraud.asp#yOovTAY2qtXRx7AY.99

**:**

__Question__
•In 59 voting districts in the Philadelphia region, Obama
received 100% of the votes with not even a single vote recorded for Romney. (A
mathematical and statistical impossibility).

__SNOPES RESPONSE:__
It is true that 59 voting divisions in Philadelphia recorded
no votes for Mitt Romney, but given the voter composition of the Philadelphia
area (and some Philadelphia wards in particular) and the number of voters in
each division, that outcome was hardly a "mathematical and statistical
impossibility."

WHERE IS THE

**EVIDENCE?**

__NON-ANECDOTAL__
SEE THE REST OF SNOPES RESPONSE TO CLAIMS OF VOTER FRAUD IN
2012 Election.

## 0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home